Comparison · generated on request
Bandwidth Saver: Image CDN vs Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN
Both plugins as this registry currently observes them. Figures come from the same daily snapshot, so they are directly comparable, which two separate wordpress.org pages, read minutes apart, are not.
| Bandwidth Saver: Image CDN | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Image CDN for WordPress. Serve images from 300+ global edge servers. Faster Core Web Vitals, better SEO. $9.99/mo. | Compress and optimize images, enable lazy load, serve WebP & AVIF, and speed up your site with a global image CDN. |
| Active installs | fewer than 10 | 1,000,000+ |
| Rating | 5.0★ (1) | 4.8★ (6,051) |
| Last release | 7 months ago | 15 days ago |
| Current owner | imgpro | WPMU DEV - Your All-in-One WordPress Platform |
| Added to directory | 24 Nov 2025 | 05 Dec 2008 |
| Tested up to | WP 6.9.7 | WP 7.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
Install figures are rounded by WordPress.org to one significant digit, so a gap smaller than a band step is not a difference. Nothing here ranks the two plugins or recommends either, and no link on this page earns anything.
Why this page is not in search results
There are roughly 1.8 billion possible pairs of WordPress plugins. Generating them would be scaled content abuse, so this registry does not: a comparison renders for anyone who asks for it, and is offered to search engines only once 25 different people have asked for that same pair within 60 days. This one has been requested by 0. Until it crosses, the page works normally but stays out of the index.
Records: Bandwidth Saver: Image CDN · Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN