Comparison · generated on request
Easy Populate Posts vs FakerPress
Both plugins as this registry currently observes them. Figures come from the same daily snapshot, so they are directly comparable, which two separate wordpress.org pages, read minutes apart, are not.
| Easy Populate Posts | FakerPress | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Populate the sites with random content: title, type, terms, meta, images, status, date, parent, sticky, Gutenberg template, etc. | FakerPress is a clean way to generate fake and dummy content to your WordPress, great for developers who need testing |
| Active installs | 200+ | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 5.0★ (10) | 4.9★ (205) |
| Last release | 5 months ago | 2 months ago |
| Current owner | Iulia Cazan | Gustavo Bordoni |
| Added to directory | 20 Oct 2015 | 17 Jun 2014 |
| Tested up to | WP 7.0.4 | WP 7.0.4 |
| Requires PHP | false | 8.1 |
Install figures are rounded by WordPress.org to one significant digit, so a gap smaller than a band step is not a difference. Nothing here ranks the two plugins or recommends either, and no link on this page earns anything.
Why this page is not in search results
There are roughly 1.8 billion possible pairs of WordPress plugins. Generating them would be scaled content abuse, so this registry does not: a comparison renders for anyone who asks for it, and is offered to search engines only once 25 different people have asked for that same pair within 60 days. This one has been requested by 0. Until it crosses, the page works normally but stays out of the index.
Records: Easy Populate Posts · FakerPress