Comparison · generated on request
ImageRecycle pdf & image compression vs Squeeze – Image Optimization & Compression, WEBP Conversion
Both plugins as this registry currently observes them. Figures come from the same daily snapshot, so they are directly comparable, which two separate wordpress.org pages, read minutes apart, are not.
| ImageRecycle pdf & image compression | Squeeze – Image Optimization & Compression, WEBP Conversion | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | ImageRecycle image & PDF compression. Make WordPress loads faster by using an automatic image and PDF optimization. | Compress images in WordPress & convert to WebP — no API key, no quotas, no cloud. Unlimited local image optimizer; private browser-side compression. |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Rating | 4.5★ (26) | 5.0★ (6) |
| Last release | 11 months ago | yesterday |
| Current owner | ImageRecycle | Bogdan Bendziukov |
| Added to directory | 10 Jul 2015 | 16 Jun 2023 |
| Tested up to | WP 6.8.8 | WP 7.1 |
| Requires PHP | 5.3 | 7.4 |
Install figures are rounded by WordPress.org to one significant digit, so a gap smaller than a band step is not a difference. Nothing here ranks the two plugins or recommends either, and no link on this page earns anything.
Why this page is not in search results
There are roughly 1.8 billion possible pairs of WordPress plugins. Generating them would be scaled content abuse, so this registry does not: a comparison renders for anyone who asks for it, and is offered to search engines only once 25 different people have asked for that same pair within 60 days. This one has been requested by 0. Until it crosses, the page works normally but stays out of the index.
Records: ImageRecycle pdf & image compression · Squeeze – Image Optimization & Compression, WEBP Conversion