Comparison · generated on request
Jinx Fast-Cache vs Static Cache Wrangler – Coverage Assistant
Both plugins as this registry currently observes them. Figures come from the same daily snapshot, so they are directly comparable, which two separate wordpress.org pages, read minutes apart, are not.
| Jinx Fast-Cache | Static Cache Wrangler – Coverage Assistant | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Blazing fast full-page caching for WordPress. Jinx Fast-Cache serves static HTML files, bypassing PHP and database overhead entirely. | Monitor cache coverage and identify uncached content for Static Cache Wrangler. |
| Active installs | fewer than 10 | fewer than 10 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Last release | 8 months ago | 14 days ago |
| Current owner | Lukas Rydygel | derickschaefer |
| Added to directory | 10 Feb 2022 | 23 Nov 2025 |
| Tested up to | WP 6.9.0 | WP 7.1 |
| Requires PHP | 8.0 | 7.4 |
Install figures are rounded by WordPress.org to one significant digit, so a gap smaller than a band step is not a difference. Nothing here ranks the two plugins or recommends either, and no link on this page earns anything.
Why this page is not in search results
There are roughly 1.8 billion possible pairs of WordPress plugins. Generating them would be scaled content abuse, so this registry does not: a comparison renders for anyone who asks for it, and is offered to search engines only once 25 different people have asked for that same pair within 60 days. This one has been requested by 0. Until it crosses, the page works normally but stays out of the index.
Records: Jinx Fast-Cache · Static Cache Wrangler – Coverage Assistant