Comparison · generated on request
PixelClients Closed Site Access vs PrimePlaced – Advanced password protection
Both plugins as this registry currently observes them. Figures come from the same daily snapshot, so they are directly comparable, which two separate wordpress.org pages, read minutes apart, are not.
| PixelClients Closed Site Access | PrimePlaced – Advanced password protection | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Protect WordPress websites with a branded password gate, access logs, visitor tracking, contact information, and IP blocking. | Lock your entire WordPress site behind a single password with a branded lock screen, session or timed access, and simple admin controls. |
| Active installs | fewer than 10 | 10+ |
| Rating | — | 5.0★ (2) |
| Last release | 4 months ago | 15 days ago |
| Current owner | pixelclients | dobrzepostawieni |
| Added to directory | 09 May 2026 | 30 Jun 2026 |
| Tested up to | WP 6.9.7 | WP 7.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
Install figures are rounded by WordPress.org to one significant digit, so a gap smaller than a band step is not a difference. Nothing here ranks the two plugins or recommends either, and no link on this page earns anything.
Why this page is not in search results
There are roughly 1.8 billion possible pairs of WordPress plugins. Generating them would be scaled content abuse, so this registry does not: a comparison renders for anyone who asks for it, and is offered to search engines only once 25 different people have asked for that same pair within 60 days. This one has been requested by 0. Until it crosses, the page works normally but stays out of the index.
Records: PixelClients Closed Site Access · PrimePlaced – Advanced password protection