Comparison · generated on request
Robots.txt Editor vs Whizz MD — Markdown Endpoints for AI Crawlers
Both plugins as this registry currently observes them. Figures come from the same daily snapshot, so they are directly comparable, which two separate wordpress.org pages, read minutes apart, are not.
| Robots.txt Editor | Whizz MD — Markdown Endpoints for AI Crawlers | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Robots.txt for WordPress | Serve every WordPress post and page as a clean .md file with full SEO frontmatter — discoverable by AI crawlers and search engines on the fly. |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | fewer than 10 |
| Rating | 4.5★ (8) | — |
| Last release | 5.5 years ago | 3 months ago |
| Current owner | Processby | Whizz People |
| Added to directory | 03 May 2019 | 15 Jun 2026 |
| Tested up to | WP 5.6.19 | WP 7.0.4 |
| Requires PHP | 5.6 | 8.0 |
Install figures are rounded by WordPress.org to one significant digit, so a gap smaller than a band step is not a difference. Nothing here ranks the two plugins or recommends either, and no link on this page earns anything.
Why this page is not in search results
There are roughly 1.8 billion possible pairs of WordPress plugins. Generating them would be scaled content abuse, so this registry does not: a comparison renders for anyone who asks for it, and is offered to search engines only once 25 different people have asked for that same pair within 60 days. This one has been requested by 0. Until it crosses, the page works normally but stays out of the index.
Records: Robots.txt Editor · Whizz MD — Markdown Endpoints for AI Crawlers